Extractive determination study of Etravirine by using Tpooo as an Analytical reagent in Pure and Pharmaceutical dosage forms
Murali Dadi1*, Indra Sen Singh1, Purnachandra Rao G2
1Department of Chemistry, Copperbelt University, Jambo Drive, Kitwe, Zambia.
2Department of Chemistry, NRI Institute of Technology, Pothavarpadu, Agiripalli, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: murali.dadi@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This study developed a sensitive and straightforward extractive spectroscopic method to estimate Etravirine (ETR) using TPooo as an analytical reagent in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms. This method was achieved based on the extractable chloroform complex formed with Tropeoline ooo (TPooo) in an acidic media. Following Beer’s law, the extractable complex showed the absorbance maximum at 485nm at the concentration ranges between 12.5-75 µg/ml with the molar absorptivity 2.195 x 103 L/mole /cm and the Sandell’s sensitivity 0.1549 µg cm-2. The result of Etravirine estimation for the present method has been validated statistically by recovery studies, and the developed method was simple, sensitive, accurate, and precise. It was validated following International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines and also successfully applied for the estimation of Etravirine in tablet dosage forms.
KEYWORDS: Etravirine, Extractive Spectrometry, TPooo, tablet dosage forms.
INTRODUCTION:
Etravirine (ETR), a non-nucleoside analog, is a diarylpyrimidine second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor1. ETR is active against HIV that confers resistance to the commonly prescribed first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. ETR binds directly to reverse transcriptase and hinders the RNA-dependent and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activities. The result is the blockage of the growth of HIV2. In combination with other antiretrovirals, ETR is designated for treating HIV type 1 infection in patients who are resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and other antiretroviral agents3,4,5. Various methods are reported in the literature for ETR determination in biological and pharmaceutical samples. They include UV spectrophotometry6,7,8, UPLC9,10,11, LC-MS12-16, HPLC-MS17,18, HPTLC19, HPLC20,21 and Pharmacokinetic studies22.
The UV spectrophotometry method6,7,8 is less selective as it involves absorbance measurements at a shorter wavelength where the interference from the excipients is more. The reported UPLC, LC-MS, HPTLC, and HPLC methods involve time-consuming procedures, sophisticated and expensive instruments that are mostly not available in pharmaceutical quality control laboratories. Furthermore, the LC-MS methods were applied for the determination of ETR in biological fluids.
To the best of our knowledge, few visible spectrophotometric methods are found in the literature to quantify ETR. Also, no UV spectrophotometric method has been reported by using TPooo. Hence the need arises to develop specific sensitive, precise, accurate, and flexible visible spectrophotometric methods, which prompted the author to choose ETR for the investigation based on various chemical reactions by exploiting various functional groups from the structure. The present study describes the estimation of ETR through an extractable ion-pair complexation of ETR with Tpooo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Instrumentation:
The present investigation used an ELICO (Hyderabad, India) double beam model SL 244 digital spectrophotometer with 1cm matched quartz cells. Samples were weighed by using a Schimadzu electronic weighing balance (Kyoto, Japan) TW223L model.
Materials and reagents:
This study used analytical grade chemicals. ETR was obtained as a gift sample from Arabindo Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, and used as received. The Tropeoline ooo (TPooo) was procured from Merk specialties Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Hydrochroric acid and chloroform were procured from Sd-fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India. All the solutions were prepared using double distilled water.
Preparation of stock and standard working solutions:
A stock solution of ETR was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of drug in 20mL of methanol in a 100mL volumetric flask and then made up to the mark with distilled water (1.0mg/mL). The stock solution was diluted stepwise with the distilled water to obtain standard working solutions of 250μg/mL concentration for this method.
The other solutions were freshly prepared for this study, as described below.
The Tropeolineooo (TPooo) solution of 0.2% (w/v) concentration was prepared by dissolving 200mg of TPooo (Merk specialties Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India) in 100mL of distilled water.
The 0.1M HCl (v/v) hydrochloric acid was prepared by diluting 8.6ml of concentrated HCl (Sd-fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India) to 1000 mL with distilled water.
General Assay Procedure:
The aliquots of (0.5–3.0 mL) standard ETR solution (250 μg/ml) were transferred into a series of 125mL separating funnels. The volume in each separating funnel was adjusted to 3.0mL with distilled water. The volumes of 6.0mL of 0.1 M HCl and 2.0mL of 0.2% TPooo were added to each separating funnel, which leads to the formation of an ion association complex between the ETR and TPooo. The funnels were shaken vigorously with 10 mL of chloroform for 20 minutes and then allowed for a clear separation of the two phases. The separated organic phase was transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask. The extract was diluted to the mark with chloroform and mixed well. The absorbance of the colored ion-pair complex was measured at 485 nm against a similar reagent blank. The amount of ETR was deduced from the calibration curve.
Assay of Etr in Tablet Dosage Form:
Intelence tablets (Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Titusville, NJ) labeled to contain 100mg/200 mg ETR per tablet were used in the present investigation. Twenty tablets were weighed and finely powdered. An accurately weighed quantity of the powder equivalent to 100mg of ETR was transferred into a 100mL calibrated flask and dissolved in about 20ml of methanol. The contents of the flask were swirled, sonicated for 10 min, and filtered through Whatmann No. 1 filter paper. The filtrate was completed to volume with distilled water. This solution was diluted quantitatively with distilled water to obtain suitable concentrations for the analysis by the proposed spectrophotometric method. The content of ETR in the tablets was calculated from the corresponding calibration curve or corresponding regression equation.
Optimization of experimental conditions:
The experimental variables were optimized to achieve maximum sensitivity and adherence to Beer’s law. The optimization was achieved by carrying out control experiments by measuring the absorbance at 485 nm for several solutions. The control experiments involved the variation in one and fixing the other parameters in each case, such as the concentration of TPooo, HCl, and organic solvent used for extraction.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Optimization of experimental conditions:
The experimental variables in the proposed spectrophotometric method, which was found to affect the color intensity and stability of the resulting colored complex, were optimized following procedure 2.6, as described earlier.
Determination of absorption maxima (λmax):
To determine the analytic wavelength, the absorption spectra of the colored chromogen were scanned in the wavelength region of 400-700 nm against a corresponding reagent blank. The results are graphically represented (Figure 1).
|
Parameter |
Investigation conditions |
Optimized condition |
Remarks |
|
λmax (nm) |
450 – 550 |
485 |
- |
|
Volume of 0.1M HCl (mL) |
1-10 |
6.0 |
Variation of the volume of HCl above the 6.0 mL and below 6.0 mL resulted in low absorbance values. |
|
Volume of 0.2% TPooo (mL) |
|||
|
Chloroform, Benzene, Carbon Tetrachloride and Butanol |
Figure 1: Absorption spectrum of ETR-TPooo
Method Validation:
The proposed method was validated for linearity, sensitivity, selectivity, stability of the colored species, accuracy, precision, robustness, and recovery according to the current ICH guidelines (ICH, 2005)23.
Linearity and sensitivity:
Under the optimum conditions, a linear relation was obtained between absorbance and concentration of ETR in the ranges given in (Table 2). The calibration graph (Figure 2) in each instance is described by the equation: Y = mX + c, (where Y = absorbance, c = intercept, m = slope and X = concentration of ETR in μg/ml). The regression coefficient, intercept, and slope for the calibration data are summarized in (Table 2). The values specify a good correlation between absorbance values and concentration of ETR in the proposed method.
Sensitivity parameters, such as apparent molar absorptivity and Sandell’s sensitivity values, the limits of detection (LOD), and limits of quantification (LOQ) are calculated as per the current International Conference on Harmonization guidelines (ICH, 2005) and compiled in (Table 2). The values indicated that the proposed method has adequate sensitivity for the analysis of ETR.
Table 2: Optical characteristics, precision and accuracy of the proposed methods for the proposed spectrophotometric method
|
Parameter |
Values |
|
Linearity range (μg/ml) |
12.5-75 |
|
Molar Absorbtivity (L/mole/cm) |
2.195 x 103 |
|
Sandell’s sensitivity (µg cm-2) |
0.1549 |
|
Optimum photometric range(μg/ml) |
10.0-100.0 |
|
Regression equation (Y=mx+c)* |
Y = 0.0062x + 0.0030 |
|
Regression coefficient (R2) |
0.9975 |
|
Slope (m) |
0.0062 |
|
Intercept (c) |
0.0030 |
|
LOD (µg/ml) |
0.760 |
|
LOQ (µg/ml) |
2.303 |
|
Stability of colored species (hr) |
1.10 |
*Y = Absorbance; x = Concentration of drug in μg/ml
Figure 2: Beer’s law plot of ETR-TPooo
Stability of colored species:
The stability of the colored species formed in the proposed method was also studied. The stability determination was done by measuring the solution's absorbance at their corresponding optimum wavelength at regular intervals of time. The results are presented in (Table 2). In the proposed method, the colored species formed was stable for at least more than 1 hr. The considerable stability helped in proceeding with a large number of samples and their comfortable measurements.
Accuracy and Precision:
Pure ETR solution at three different concentration levels (12.5, 37.5 and 75µg/ml) were prepared and analyzed in five replicates during the same day (intra-day precision) to determine the accuracy and precision of the proposed method. The same exercise was repeated on three consecutive days (inter-day precision) by the proposed method. The results are presented in Table 3.
Table 4. Robustness of the proposed spectrophotometric method
|
Parameter |
Concentration of ETR (μg/ml) |
SD |
Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) |
|
|
Taken |
Found* |
||||
|
Volume of 0.1M HCl (6.0 ± 0.2 ml) |
12.5 |
12.48 |
0.0141 |
99.84 |
0.113 |
|
75 |
74.98 |
0.0150 |
99.97 |
0.020 |
|
|
Volume of 0.2% TPooo (2.0 ± 0.2 ml) |
12.5 |
12.52 |
0.0158 |
100.16 |
0.126 |
|
75 |
74.97 |
0.0187 |
99.96 |
0.024 |
|
* Average of three determinations
Analysis of Tablets Containing Etravirine:
|
Intra-day precision and accuracy |
||||||
|
Concentration of ETR (μg/ml) |
SD |
RSD(%) |
Recovery (%) |
Confidence limit |
||
|
Taken |
Found* |
0.05 |
0.01 |
|||
|
12.5 |
12.488 |
0.02126 |
0.170 |
99.90 |
0.01776 |
0.02630 |
|
37.5 |
37.503 |
0.02315 |
0.061 |
100.00 |
0.01935 |
0.02863 |
|
75 |
75.07 |
0.08258 |
0.110 |
100.09 |
0.06905 |
0.10215 |
|
Inter-day precision and accuracy |
||||||
|
Concentration of ETR (μg/ml) |
SD |
RSD(%) |
Recovery (%) |
Confidence limit |
||
|
Taken |
Found* |
0.05 |
0.01 |
|||
|
12.5 |
12.490 |
0.02383 |
0.190 |
99.92 |
0.01992 |
0.02947 |
|
37.5 |
37.498 |
0.02932 |
0.078 |
99.99 |
0.02451 |
0.03627 |
|
75 |
75.125 |
0.12094 |
0.160 |
100.16 |
0.10112 |
0.14961 |
* Average of five determinations
|
Labeled claim (mg) |
Found * |
SD |
% RSD |
% Recovery |
t-Value ** |
F-Value *** |
|
100 |
99.50 |
0.02640 |
0.2653 |
99.50 |
0.3629 |
1.2975 |
|
200 |
200 |
0.06029 |
0.0301 |
99.97 |
0.1254 |
1.5027 |
*Average of six determinations
** tabulated t value = 1.833
*** tabulated F value = 5.19
Chemistry of The Colored Products:
Received on 01.12.2020 Modified on 19.04.2021
Accepted on 24.06.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm.and Tech 2022; 15(3):1145-1150.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00192